All Topics 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z 396 270 36 84 0 99 8018691 mail loop test 1594768510 2020-07-14T23:15:11Z 2020-07-14T23:15:11Z Engineering engineering mail test 1594768510 question 0 1 1 create 8018684 Just looking at a RAW image in Lightroom Classic version 9.2.1 updates its’ XMP file 2020-07-14T23:14:50Z 2020-07-14T22:19:49Z Robert Ripps robert_ripps Was looking at some older raw images that I have not touched in years, so the modification date of the XMP files are years old. When I view an image, and hit Command +R to revel it in the finder, the modification date of the XMP file updates to that time/date, even though I have not touched the file (nothing in Develop module, no rating change, no keywords, etc.). So just locating the file updates the XMP date. <p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">Then I noticed that if I merely advance to the next image in Lightroom, the XMP modification date changes as well. And, Lightroom also changes the <i alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">next</i> file’s (in the same folder) XMP date, even though I have not yet advanced to it or viewed that file today! </p><p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">This is troubling to me- what exactly is Lightroom changing in XMP file? These are archived files, so now I am worried about what Lightroom is doing. This also makes it really difficult to judge by looking at and XMP when I last actually made changes to the images metadata/develop settings. This is very frustrating. And I don’t remember noticing that previous versions did this. </p><p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">Viewing image 207 in Lightroom-</p><p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""> <img alt="" name="" rel="" src="" target="" title="Image httpsd2r1vs3d9006apcloudfrontnets3_images1844054RackMultipart20200714-70767-vl2ods-Viewing_207_inlinepng1594765125" type="" value="" /></p><p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /></p><p alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">Viewing image 208 in Lightroom- <br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /></p><img alt="" name="" rel="" src="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /> problem 3 4 1 comment 8018457 Persuasion (1995) vs. "Screen Two" (1985) {Persuasion (#11.3)} 2020-07-14T23:13:23Z 2020-07-14T00:34:56Z gromit82 gromit82 In 1995, a filmed version of Jane Austen's "Persuasion" was made, directed by Roger Michell and starring Amanda Root and&nbsp;Ciarán Hinds.<br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" />This production debuted on television in the UK as part of the "Screen Two" (1985) series, but was released theatrically in the USA. Consequently, it has been listed by IMDb for many years as an episode of "Screen Two":&nbsp;<a alt="" href="" name="" rel="nofollow" target="" title="" type="" value=""></a><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" />However, apparently around November 2019, a separate entry for&nbsp;<i alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="">Persuasion</i> as a 1995 theatrical film was added to IMDb:&nbsp;<a alt="" href="" name="" rel="nofollow" target="" title="" type="" value=""></a>&nbsp; Note that both productions have the same cast.<br /><br />Am I correct in saying that adding the separate entry for the theatrical version of&nbsp;<i>Persuasion</i> was an error, as opposed to a change of policy? Should the theatrical version be merged into the "Screen Two" episode? question complete 2 2 1 comment 8018670 How I can watch or download the movie? 2020-07-14T23:11:35Z 2020-07-14T21:07:58Z Muhammad Tehseen muhammad_tehseen Unable to watch any movie question pending 1 2 1 comment 8018558 Reporting 2020-07-14T23:10:49Z 2020-07-14T12:48:48Z Michael Moore michael_moore_6707282 I have recently reported a few images during voting in the Nature Up Close category, always flowers, only to receive an email advising that the report has been rejected as the image in question is more than six months old.<br /><br />&nbsp;I appreciate that this is built into the report mechanism but there is now way of knowing how old an image is, so would it not be better to exclude images more than six moths old from the daily voting? problem pending 5 3 1 comment 8018633 Can't find any way of actually watching a film ! 2020-07-14T23:09:09Z 2020-07-14T18:27:58Z John Holgate john_holgate I have downloaded the app,opened an account,chosen a film and put it in a watchlist ... but nowhere can I find a way of watching it ... free or by paying.Whatever I click on just returns to add to watchlist.What simple mistake am I making ?! question pending 2 3 1 comment 8018448 I removed a R510 from my system and cannot figure out how to add it back 2020-07-14T23:04:52Z 2020-07-13T23:53:25Z Hermin Lalefar hermin_lalefar I moved into a Lennar home with two R510 and a ICX7150C12P. I have connected to the Master R510 and could never get the the other one to work, so removed it from the dashboard. Now, I have no idea how to get it back. I reset the missing one and still nothing. Any help would be appreciated. question pending 4 4 1 comment 8018621 Lightroom Classic: Double click on image thumbnail has no response 2020-07-14T22:56:12Z 2020-07-14T17:33:00Z David Wilkins david_wilkins_4767682 Double clicking on a image in grid view usually brings up a list of options.&nbsp; With the latest release of Lightroom Classic most of the time double clicking does nothing.&nbsp; I can go to menu, photos and get the options there.&nbsp; It has been my experience that many mouse options do not work the same in this release. problem 5 6 1 comment 8018588 Camera Raw 12.3: I absolutely hate the new UI, anyone else with me? 2020-07-14T22:53:22Z 2020-07-14T15:37:26Z krista newbill krista_newbill I was working on a big wedding, took a break and saw Adobe wanted me to update. So I hit update, came back to my computer to find ACR completely jacked up. SERIOUSLY???? I am so upset and angry right now. Can you give people a freakin heads up when you're about to completely screw up their entire day???? I HATE LIGHTROOM. I do not use LIGHTROOM because ACR is much simpler. But not anymore!!! ACR is totally completely different. I can't find half of the crap I usually use. All of my presets are gone. Everything is different? Why? Whyyyyyyyyy??? did you do this???? The dumbest thing I've ever seen. I'm so so so irritated right now. I see some people posting that I can revert and follow 1 million steps to hopefully return to the old version. Now I'll have to spend hours trying to do that. I do not to the depths of my soul understand why you would do this to everyone. At least in the future put a giant warning "HEY SO AND SO IF YOU PUSH THIS BUTTON PREPARE TO SPEND HOURS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WTH IS GOING ON AND HAVE YOUR ENTIRE WORKFLOW GO OUT THE WINDOW....." ????!!!!! problem 16 9 4 comment 8018690 Registration Assistance 2020-07-14T22:53:01Z 2020-07-14T22:53:01Z Michelle Yanez michelle_yanez My son tried registering, but he keeps receiving a message that he's already registered, even though he never has. We attempted to retrieve a username and password, but are not able to access any account. problem 0 1 1 create 8018689 Problem with review 2020-07-14T22:51:39Z 2020-07-14T22:51:39Z Jaype jaype_eb6evyt9fdoel My review of The old guard has been declined for violating the community guidelines and frankly, I don't understand why, especially since so many reviews sharing discriminatory views towards women, POC and gays have been published. I'm wondering what in my comment could have been worse than that. Maybe someone can shed some light on what's wrong so I know what to avoid next time? Thanks. Here it is:&nbsp;<br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" />"It's inconceivable that with characters with such history, they chose to discard almost all of it in favour of a vapid action flick with a boringly standard development arc. The vilain is a risible caricature and the astoundingly unpurposeful high bodycount brings the films to feel like a boring and endless fight and kill scene.<br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" />The script is devoid of any intelligence and relies heavily on sanitized meaningless violence as a filler to compensate for its lack of imagination. Instead of character insight they dropped us some meaningless vignettes in a desperate attempt to make us care for any of them. What could have been a rich origin story has been turned into a dull excuse to build a franchise.<br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /><br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" />Is that all the action genre condemned to be? A formula devoid of any depth? A sad excuse of choreographed inconsequential fight and kill scenes so expected they're devoid of all tension? Has everyone forgot we actually need to identify with the characters on screen and to do so we need to know them? Remember when fight scenes were epic and had us emotionally invested because there were buildups leading to them? This insipid action porn is getting old."<br alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /> question 0 1 1 create 8018688 Hope whatever FamilySearch comes up with to replace GetSat is better than the FamilySearch Community - Support Questions - Groups. 2020-07-14T22:47:36Z 2020-07-14T22:47:36Z Don M Thomas don_martin_thomas I don't even like viewing things on the FamilySearch Community pages. Hardly even go there now, and will stop completely if that is the replacement of GetSat. <a href="" rel="nofollow"></a> idea 0 0 1 create 8018687 mail loop test 1594766715 2020-07-14T22:45:15Z 2020-07-14T22:45:15Z Engineering engineering mail test 1594766715 question 0 1 1 create 8018445 Lightroom Desktop: on macOS JPG export color issues 2020-07-14T22:38:04Z 2020-07-13T23:44:28Z Justin Bonnar justin_bonnar When exporting&nbsp;from Lightroom CC on macOS, the exported JPG takes on remarkably different colors (it looks like a lower/bluer color temperature, but I'm not precisely sure). The difference appears within the Lightroom CC export preview prior to exporting, as well as with the exported image when opened in other applications. Different images have different levels of impact, but I've seen visible differences in most of my images. The issue appears regardless of what Color Space is selected for the exported JPG.<br /><br />I do not have issues when exporting the same image with Lightroom CC on iPad. I've tested by exporting the same image with the identical settings on iPad and the image is reproduced faithfully.<br /><br />I'm running Lightroom CC Version 3.3 from the Mac App Store (20200611-1039-7df19f1 Build) on macOS 10.15.5 on a MacBook Pro (Retina, Mid 2012).<br /><br />Screenshot editing the image (colors as desired):<br /><img src="" title="Image https//d2r1vs3d9006apcloudfrontnet/s3_images/1843959/RackMultipart20200713-37792-8pcgis-Screen_Shot_2020-07-13_at_14701_PM_inlinepng1594683740" /><br /><br />Screenshot of export preview, displaying color issues (occurs regardless of Color Space selection):<br /><img src="" title="Image https//d2r1vs3d9006apcloudfrontnet/s3_images/1843958/RackMultipart20200713-79125-1bx3fmm-Screen_Shot_2020-07-13_at_14732_PM_inlinepng1594683707" /><br />Exported image from macOS, with color issues:<br /><img src="" title="Image https//d2r1vs3d9006apcloudfrontnet/s3_images/1843960/RackMultipart20200713-49366-hb5n83-L1000119_-_macOS_Export_inlinejpg1594683814" /><br /><br />Exported image from Lightroom CC on iPad, identical settings selection, but no color issues:<br /><img src="" title="Image https//d2r1vs3d9006apcloudfrontnet/s3_images/1843961/RackMultipart20200713-34445-1fya01b-L1000119_-_iPad_Export_inlinejpg1594683847" /><br /><br />For reference, I posted some details, including these screenshots of the issue and exported images, in the Lightroom community thread&nbsp;<a href="" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Link httpscommunityadobecomt5lightroomtrouble-exporting-image-with-my-editsm-p11285384M29423">Trouble exporting image with my edits</a>&nbsp;thread. Another user reported similar issues in a&nbsp;<a href="" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Link httpscommunityadobecomt5lightroompink-hue-rendered-upon-exportm-p11285456">Pink hue rendered upon export</a>&nbsp;thread. problem 15 6 2 comment 8018686 Make and Receive Calls from both the Max Agent and RC App 2020-07-14T22:36:02Z 2020-07-14T22:36:02Z Hannah Tieu hannah_tieu Currently, through RingCentral Contact Center, users can make and receive calls via their max agents. A request should be made to have calls to be made and receive both on the max agent as well as the RingCentral app.&nbsp; idea 0 1 1 create